[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[nptl] Re: Advance on bug with SCHED_RR thread
Hi Sébastien,
thanks for being *SO* fast!!
I have issued a bugzilla on OSDL.
The title was the same as for the Bugzilla on Red-Hat.
But I can't find it anymore :-(
P.S: Perhaps I should re-issue the bug report?
Cheers,
Loic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bool Boole = (0x2B || !0x2B); // that was shakespear!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Thank for your patience :)
>
> Here are the results (both runs on dual-i686)
>
> -- Conf 1 --
> kernel: 2.6.9 vanilla
> glibc : from Fedora Core 2
> build : gcc -lpthread -lrt test_schedrr3.c -o test
> Result: the problem appears:
> # ./test 10 50
> [...]
> testdrv> Wait that all threads run...
> Thread 1: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 2: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 3: started for 29.463012000 sec, sched. 3729722 times
> Thread 4: started for 29.463015000 sec, sched. 3729735 times
> Thread 5: started for 29.910831000 sec, sched. 3804873 times
> Thread 6: started for 29.910834000 sec, sched. 3804876 times
> Thread 7: started for 29.910837000 sec, sched. 3804879 times
> Thread 8: started for 29.910840000 sec, sched. 3804877 times
> Thread 9: started for 29.910843000 sec, sched. 3804882 times
> Thread 10: started for 29.910853000 sec, sched. 3804884 times
> TIMED OUT
>
>
> -- Conf 2 --
> kernel: 2.6.9 vanilla
> glibc : fresh CVS from monday
> build : gcc -B/home1/cvs/root -B/home1/cvs/root/lib
> -Wl,-rpath,/home1/cvs/root/lib,-dynamic-linker,/home1/cvs/root/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -L/home1/cvs/root/lib -lc -lpthread -lrt test_schedrr3.c -o test2
> Result: same as above:
> # ./test2 10 50
> [...]
> testdrv> Wait that all threads run...
> Thread 1: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 2: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 3: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 4: created but NOT STARTED
> Thread 5: started for 29.928881000 sec, sched. 5126832 times
> Thread 6: started for 29.992817000 sec, sched. 5139456 times
> Thread 7: started for 29.992820000 sec, sched. 5139461 times
> Thread 8: started for 29.992822000 sec, sched. 5139465 times
> Thread 9: started for 29.992825000 sec, sched. 5139462 times
> Thread 10: started for 29.992833000 sec, sched. 5139462 times
> TIMED OUT
>
>
> So, I think you can safely report this to OSDL :)
>
> Best regards,
> Seb.
>
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 23:46, Loic Domaigne wrote:
>
>>>Yes, you're right. I've been busy lately so I somehow forgot this bug,
>>>but anyway it has to be processed!
>>>
>>>I'll have to test again with a 2.6.9 kernel, but it was here with the
>>>2.6.8.1 vanilla one.
>>>
>>>I should be able to give it some time in the end of this week.
>>
>>Ok, I'll wait for a confirumation on 2.6.9 vanilla kernel. If it is
>>confirmed, I shall post a bugzilla on OSDL.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Loic.
>>Liste de diffusion nptl
>>Pour se dsinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
> -------------------------------
> Sebastien DECUGIS
> NPTL Test & Trace Project
> http://nptl.bullopensource.org/
>
> "You may fail if you try.
> You -will- fail if you don't."
>
>
> Liste de diffusion nptl
> Pour se désinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
Liste de diffusion nptl
Pour se désinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe