[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[nptl] Re: Advance on bug with SCHED_RR thread



Can you give me the URL of the OSDL bugzilla?

Thanks

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 18:58, Loic Domaigne wrote:
> Hi Sébastien,
> 
> thanks for being *SO* fast!!
> 
> I have issued a bugzilla on OSDL.
> The title was the same as for the Bugzilla on Red-Hat.
> But I can't find it anymore :-(
> 
> P.S: Perhaps I should re-issue the bug report?
> 
> Cheers,
> Loic.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> bool Boole = (0x2B || !0x2B); // that was shakespear!
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> > Thank for your patience :)
> > 
> > Here are the results (both runs on dual-i686)
> > 
> > -- Conf 1 --
> > kernel: 2.6.9 vanilla
> > glibc : from Fedora Core 2
> > build : gcc -lpthread -lrt test_schedrr3.c -o test
> > Result: the problem appears:
> > # ./test 10 50
> > [...]
> > testdrv> Wait that all threads run...
> > Thread     1: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     2: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     3: started for 29.463012000 sec, sched. 3729722 times
> > Thread     4: started for 29.463015000 sec, sched. 3729735 times
> > Thread     5: started for 29.910831000 sec, sched. 3804873 times
> > Thread     6: started for 29.910834000 sec, sched. 3804876 times
> > Thread     7: started for 29.910837000 sec, sched. 3804879 times
> > Thread     8: started for 29.910840000 sec, sched. 3804877 times
> > Thread     9: started for 29.910843000 sec, sched. 3804882 times
> > Thread    10: started for 29.910853000 sec, sched. 3804884 times
> > TIMED OUT
> > 
> > 
> > -- Conf 2 --
> > kernel: 2.6.9 vanilla
> > glibc : fresh CVS from monday
> > build : gcc -B/home1/cvs/root -B/home1/cvs/root/lib
> > -Wl,-rpath,/home1/cvs/root/lib,-dynamic-linker,/home1/cvs/root/lib/ld-linux.so.2  -L/home1/cvs/root/lib -lc -lpthread -lrt test_schedrr3.c -o test2
> > Result: same as above:
> > # ./test2 10 50
> > [...]
> > testdrv> Wait that all threads run...
> > Thread     1: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     2: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     3: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     4: created but NOT STARTED
> > Thread     5: started for 29.928881000 sec, sched. 5126832 times
> > Thread     6: started for 29.992817000 sec, sched. 5139456 times
> > Thread     7: started for 29.992820000 sec, sched. 5139461 times
> > Thread     8: started for 29.992822000 sec, sched. 5139465 times
> > Thread     9: started for 29.992825000 sec, sched. 5139462 times
> > Thread    10: started for 29.992833000 sec, sched. 5139462 times
> > TIMED OUT
> > 
> > 
> > So, I think you can safely report this to OSDL :)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Seb.
> > 
> > On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 23:46, Loic Domaigne wrote:
> > 
> >>>Yes, you're right. I've been busy lately so I somehow forgot this bug,
> >>>but anyway it has to be processed! 
> >>>
> >>>I'll have to test again with a 2.6.9 kernel, but it was here with the
> >>>2.6.8.1 vanilla one.
> >>>
> >>>I should be able to give it some time in the end of this week.
> >>
> >>Ok, I'll wait for a confirumation on 2.6.9 vanilla kernel. If it is 
> >>confirmed, I shall post a bugzilla on OSDL.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Loic.
> >>Liste de diffusion nptl
> >>Pour se dsinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > 
> > -------------------------------
> > Sebastien DECUGIS
> > NPTL Test & Trace Project
> > http://nptl.bullopensource.org/
> > 
> > "You may fail if you try.
> > You -will- fail if you don't."
> > 
> > 
> > Liste de diffusion nptl
> > Pour se désinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > 
> > 
> 
> Liste de diffusion nptl
> Pour se désinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe
-------------------------------
Sebastien DECUGIS
NPTL Test & Trace Project
http://nptl.bullopensource.org/

"You may fail if you try.
You -will- fail if you don't."


Liste de diffusion nptl
Pour se désinscrire : mailto:nptl_request@bullopensource.org?subject=unsubscribe